Video Training / Business and Marketing Tutorials →Communicating Through Disagreement at Work

What you'll learn

Distinguish healthy vs. unhealthy conflict and redirect conversations toward problem-solving.
Identify root causes of disagreement: goals, triggers, bias, and miscommunication.
Use EQ tools to regulate emotions and de-escalate tense workplace discussions.
Apply Crucial Conversations and Nonviolent Communication to high-stakes talks.
Adapt your approach using the 5 Thomas-Kilmann conflict styles for any situation.
Find common ground, negotiate solutions, and end disagreements with clear next steps.

Requirements

There are no prerequisites for this course

Description

Disagreement at work is inevitable—but it doesn't have to be uncomfortable, personal, or destructive.
Consider this: research commonly finds that employees spend roughly 2–3 hours per week dealing with conflict, and communication breakdowns remain one of the most frequent reasons projects stall, relationships fray, and trust erodes. In fast-paced workplaces—especially with remote teams, cross-functional priorities, and cultural differences—small misunderstandings can quickly turn into tense meetings, silent resistance, or escalation.
So the question becomes: when stakes are high and opinions differ, can you keep conversations respectful, productive, and decision-focused?
That's exactly what this course is designed to teach.
In Communicating Through Disagreement, you'll learn how to turn conflict into better thinking, stronger relationships, and clearer outcomes—without avoiding hard conversations or bulldozing through them.

You'll learn how to

• Recognize the difference between healthy vs. unhealthy conflict—and steer conversations toward productive disagreement
• Identify the real drivers of conflict (miscommunication, clashing goals, emotional triggers, cognitive biases, and hidden root causes)
• Use emotional intelligence to stay calm under pressure and de-escalate tense moments
• Strengthen core communication skills like active listening, asking better questions, and speaking with clarity and respect
• Find common ground by shifting from "me vs. you" to "us vs. the problem," and focusing on interests—not positions
• Adapt your approach using the Thomas-Kilmann conflict styles (competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, accommodating)
• Apply structured frameworks when conversations are difficult
• Crucial Conversations (Start with Heart, Make it Safe, STATE your path, Move to Action)
• Nonviolent Communication (Observation, Feeling, Need, Request)
• A simple mediation-style structure for team conflicts
• Navigate special situations: remote disagreements, cross-cultural communication gaps, and disagreements across power levels
• Know when (and how) to escalate issues appropriately (HR, ethics, safety, harassment/discrimination)
Along the way, you'll see real-world examples and lessons inspired by organizations like Microsoft, Bridgewater Associates, Toyota, Inova Health System, and Starbucks—showing how communication in disagreement can either damage performance or unlock it.
By the end of this course, you'll have a repeatable toolkit for tough conversations: how to prepare, what to say, how to listen, how to recover when things get heated, and how to drive clear next steps.
Whether you're trying to speak up with confidence, lead more productive meetings, or build a culture where honest dialogue is safe and valued, this course will help you turn disagreement into better outcomes—for you and your team.

Who this course is for

Individual contributors who want to speak up without sounding combative
Managers and team leads handling performance, priorities, and team tension
Project managers and cross-functional leaders managing competing goals
Remote and hybrid professionals who experience tone and miscommunication issues
Professionals working across cultures who want to reduce misunderstandings
Leaders who want to build psychological safety and healthy debate on their teams
Client-facing roles (sales, account management, consulting) managing conflict diplomatically
Anyone who avoids conflict—or escalates too quickly—and wants a better approach